For years there seemed to be just one efficient path to store data on a personal computer – by using a disk drive (HDD). Nevertheless, this type of technology is by now demonstrating its age – hard drives are actually loud and sluggish; they’re power–ravenous and frequently create lots of warmth for the duration of serious operations.
SSD drives, however, are swift, take in a lesser amount of energy and are generally much cooler. They provide a completely new strategy to file accessibility and storage and are years in front of HDDs regarding file read/write speed, I/O performance and energy efficacy. Observe how HDDs fare against the newer SSD drives.
1. Access Time
SSD drives offer a completely new & imaginative method to data safe–keeping based on the usage of electronic interfaces rather than any moving components and spinning disks. This brand–new technology is considerably quicker, allowing for a 0.1 millisecond data file accessibility time.
HDD drives continue to make use of the same basic data access technology which was initially created in the 1950s. Even though it has been vastly improved after that, it’s sluggish compared to what SSDs will offer. HDD drives’ data file access rate ranges between 5 and 8 milliseconds.
2. Random I/O Performance
Because of the very same revolutionary solution that enables for faster access times, it’s also possible to experience much better I/O effectiveness with SSD drives. They are able to conduct twice as many operations within a given time when compared to an HDD drive.
An SSD can handle at the very least 6000 IO’s per second.
Having an HDD drive, the I/O performance steadily increases the more you use the drive. Nevertheless, as soon as it reaches a particular limitation, it can’t get swifter. And because of the now–old concept, that I/O cap is noticeably lower than what you could receive with a SSD.
HDD can only go so far as 400 IO’s per second.
The lack of moving elements and rotating disks in SSD drives, and also the latest advances in electronic interface technology have ended in an extremely less risky file storage device, with a normal failure rate of 0.5%.
HDD drives implement rotating disks for saving and reading through info – a technology dating back to the 1950s. Along with disks magnetically hanging in the air, spinning at 7200 rpm, the chances of some thing failing are much increased.
The normal rate of failure of HDD drives can vary among 2% and 5%.
4. Energy Conservation
SSDs lack moving parts and need little or no cooling down energy. Additionally, they need not much power to perform – lab tests have indicated that they can be powered by a normal AA battery.
As a whole, SSDs take in somewhere between 2 and 5 watts.
From the time they were constructed, HDDs have invariably been very electricity–ravenous systems. When you’ve got a hosting server with numerous HDD drives, this can raise the month–to–month electric bill.
Typically, HDDs consume somewhere between 6 and 15 watts.
5. CPU Power
Because of SSD drives’ better I/O effectiveness, the key hosting server CPU can easily work with file requests much faster and preserve time for other procedures.
The common I/O wait for SSD drives is only 1%.
When compared with SSDs, HDDs enable slower data access speeds. The CPU is going to lose time waiting for the HDD to come back the requested file, reserving its allocations for the time being.
The typical I/O wait for HDD drives is around 7%.
6.Input/Output Request Times
The majority of Interplanets Hosting’s new web servers are now using exclusively SSD drives. Our personal tests have demostrated that using an SSD, the common service time for an I/O request whilst running a backup stays below 20 ms.
With the same web server, however, this time equipped with HDDs, the results were different. The common service time for any I/O query changed somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.
7. Backup Rates
Referring to back–ups and SSDs – we have witnessed an amazing advancement in the back up rate as we turned to SSDs. Now, a common web server data backup will take solely 6 hours.
Over the years, we’ve made use of mainly HDD drives on our machines and we’re familiar with their efficiency. On a server built with HDD drives, a full web server backup often takes about 20 to 24 hours.
If you want to promptly add to the performance of your respective web sites without needing to modify any kind of code, an SSD–operated hosting solution is a good option. Examine the shared web hosting packages as well as our VPS servers – these hosting solutions have quick SSD drives and are offered at good prices.
- Live Demo
- Sign up now. There won’t be any configuration costs and you will have complete root/administrator access to your server. 99.9% network availability is guaranteed.
Compare our prices
- Review the allocations and capabilities offered by our Virtual Private Servers. You could start with a cheaper VPS Hosting configuration and move up with simply a click of the mouse as your demands grow.
- Compare our hosting plans
- It is easy to get in contact with us 7 days a week by email or by making use of our ultra–fast ticketing system. Our company offers a 1–hour response time frame warranty.